Arista Networks Leaf / Top-of-Rack Switches Maintenance
side by side.
TechCare TPM vs. A-Care. Cost range, EOSL advantages, migration path and DACH compliance at a glance — for IT leadership and procurement.
Cost comparison
Example Arista 7050X3 switch with 4-year A-Care 24×7×4: TechCare TPM roughly 35–53% below the OEM price.
Active EOSL lines
- 7050X / 7050X2 (legacy ToR) · EOSL 2024-12-31
- 7050X3 (10/25/50/100G ToR) · EOSL 2028-06-30
- 7050X4 / 7060X5 (400G ToR) · EOSL 2031-12-31
Which Leaf/ToR models we service
- 7050X series · mainstream Leaf
- 7050SX/7050QX/7050TX (all variants) · 7050SX2/QX2 · 7050SX3/QX3
- 7060X series · high-density 100/400G
- 7060CX-32S · 7060CX2-32S · 7060PX4-32 · 7060SX2-48
- 7150/7160 · low-latency
- 7150S-24/52 · 7160-32/48 (trading, HPC, sub-µs latency)
- 7020/7010T · older (EOSL)
- 7020TR-48 · 7010T-48 (released 2014-2015, EOSL reached)
- Components & optics
- Power supplies · fan trays · 1/10/25/40/100/400G optics · SFP/SFP+/QSFP+/QSFP28/QSFP-DD
EOSL status of Leaf/ToR generations
| Generation | Released | End of vendor support | TechCare TPM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7020/7010T | 2014–2015 | 2022–2023 | Recommended |
| 7050X (1. Generation) | 2013–2015 | 2022–2024 | Recommended |
| 7050X2 | 2015–2017 | 2024–2025 | Recommended |
| 7050X3 | 2018+ | 2026–2027 | Supported |
| 7060X / 7060X2 / 7060PX4 | 2017+ | ca. 2027+ | Supported |
| 7150 / 7160 | 2014–2017 | 2024–2026 | Supported |
Why TPM maintenance for Arista Leaf/ToR
Arista A-Care sits at the upper market segment — a typical spine-leaf fabric with 24-48 leaf switches quickly becomes a significant annual maintenance budget item. The hardware layer of the leaf switches is comparatively simple (single-ASIC boxes without modular chassis), the complexity lies in the EOS software stack with MLAG, EVPN-VXLAN, IP Fabric and CloudVision integration. TPM uses this separation — we replace hardware maintenance (power supplies, fan trays, optics, box replacement if needed) at 40-50 percent of the A-Care price, EOS and CloudVision continue independently.
We service Arista Leaf/ToR switches with OEM power supplies, fan trays and optics from our own warehouse. 7050X series has gone through several generations over the years (X, X2, X3) — components are not interchangeable across generations, so we stock all variants. For low-latency 7150/7160 switches, hardware components are identical to 7050X, but EOS configuration is optimized for sub-µs latency — TPM does not affect latency optimization because EOS remains unchanged.
OEM vs. TechCare — where the switch pays off
The full OEM-vs-TPM matrix (spare parts, SLA tiers, language, sub-outsourcing, compliance docs, reporting) is the same for every Arista Networks line — see the Arista Networks battle card.
Stays with Arista Networks
- EOS software licenses + major updates
- CloudVision subscription
- Arista TAC software tickets
Moves to TechCare
- Hardware defects (memory, disk, PSU, mainboard, modules)
- 24×7×4 on-site SLA with German-speaking field service
- Spare-parts logistics DACH + global hub network
- Fixed-price contract in 48 h, one inventory — one contract
DACH compliance by design.
BAIT/MaRisk documentation package, DORA Art. 28 contract template, ISO 27001 and GDPR-compliant media handling apply identically to every Arista Networks line — details on the Arista Networks battle card.
Migration path from first contact to hand-over.
Same four steps for every Arista Networks line: inventory → fixed-price quote in 48 h → contract (BAIT/MaRisk/DORA hooks) → hand-over with spare-parts provisioning. Details on the Arista Networks battle card.
FAQ on Leaf/ToR maintenance
- Which Arista Leaf/ToR models do you service?
- Complete Leaf/ToR family: 7050X series (all generations X, X2, X3 with SX/QX/TX variants), 7060X series (7060CX-32S, 7060CX2-32S, 7060PX4-32, 7060SX2-48 for 100/400G), 7150/7160 (7150S-24/52, 7160-32/48 for low-latency trading and HPC) and the older 7020/7010T line (7020TR-48, 7010T-48, EOSL reached). Including all power supplies, fan trays and optics modules.
- What does TPM cost for Arista Leaf compared to A-Care?
- 30 to 60 percent savings. For a 7050X3-48S leaf with 24×7×4, TechCare is roughly 55% below the Arista price. For a complete spine-leaf fabric with 32 leaf switches, TechCare is roughly 55–60% below Arista A-Care. For EOSL 7020/7010T fleets we see up to 70 percent — Arista often no longer offers renewal.
- Do EOS, MLAG and EVPN-VXLAN continue to work without an Arista contract?
- Yes. EOS (Extensible Operating System), MLAG (Multi-Chassis Link Aggregation), EVPN-VXLAN, IP Fabric, all layer 2/3 functions, OSPF/BGP/IS-IS and VXLAN tunneling continue without licensing — they are part of the EOS firmware. EOS updates to newer versions require an active Arista contract. Usually uncritical with stable spine-leaf configurations — many customers run 4-6 years on the same EOS version.
- What about Arista CloudVision?
- CloudVision (CVP) is Arista's central management and telemetry platform — software subscription independent of hardware maintenance. Customers actively using CloudVision for configuration management, streaming telemetry, NetDB or the application visibility features should keep the CVP subscription with Arista — hardware maintenance runs in parallel via TPM. Switch-to-CVP integration and all CloudVision functions stay functionally active.
- Can you service EOSL 7020/7010T and older 7050X?
- Yes, a focus area of our Arista business. 7020/7010T (released 2014-2015, EOSL 2022-2023) and early 7050X generation (2013-2015, EOSL 2022-2024) are still productive in DACH data centers — typically in stable spine-leaf fabrics that don't necessarily need refresh. We stock switches, power supplies, fan trays and optics for these generations. EOS on older 7050X continues to work.
- Which SLA levels do you recommend for leaf switches?
- Spine-leaf fabrics are redundantly designed — leaf switches typically work as MLAG pair, a leaf failure is absorbed by the partner. 5×9 NBD is therefore economically appropriate for most leaf sites. For low-latency 7150/7160 in trading environments, 24×7×4 with German-speaking onsite engineer is standard — trading outage has direct penalty risks. Multi-site contracts with mixed SLA levels are standard in practice.